← All verticals
API/Infrastructure

What we learned from API/Infrastructure YC applications

Aggregate insights from real applications roasted on YC Roaster — the patterns YC partners look for, and the weaknesses that come up over and over.

Apps analyzed

28

Average score

3.20 /5

Updated

Jun 15, 2026

Score breakdown — API/Infrastructure average

App Completeness3.77/5
Early Traction2.49/5
Team Quality3.56/5
Market3.47/5
GTM2.65/5
Scalability3.61/5
Monetization2.89/5

Biggest weaknesses

Where API/Infrastructure applications consistently fall short.

  • 1. Early Traction2.49/5
  • 2. GTM2.65/5
  • 3. Monetization2.89/5

Strongest dimensions

Where API/Infrastructure applications tend to do well.

  • 1. App Completeness3.77/5
  • 2. Scalability3.61/5
  • 3. Team Quality3.56/5

Score distribution

0-1
3
1-2
0
2-3
1
3-4
20
4-5
4

What our AI judge actually said

Anonymized critique from real API/Infrastructure applications (shared with founder consent).

You're a solo founder with zero users building three-sided infrastructure that only works if EU regulators force adoption on your exact timeline.

4.7/10·Impressive technical architecture and rollup experience, but show me one paying customer and a co-founder before the runway burns.

You're still in high-touch services mode with no repeatable sales motion, every deal is a custom six-month pilot, and two founders are part-time.

7.9/10·Strong team and real pain, but prove workflows generalize and you can scale past founder-led implementation before PagerDuty eats your lunch.

Three free pilots with no revenue and vague pricing is not a business, it's a feature waiting to be absorbed by Komodor.

6.6/10·Strong technical team hunting for product-market fit in a crowded space. Prove one pilot converts to paid, or this stays a science project.

You have built a capable technical system with zero pull from the world: no users, no revenue, no design partners, no evidence of developer demand beyond founder intuition.

6.3/10·Strong technical founder building real infrastructure, but you have built in a vacuum and need 3 design partners using this in production within 8 weeks or it remains a solution looking for a problem.

You built a technically sophisticated auction engine for dating apps that have never asked for one, with zero revenue and a sales motion that starts next week.

6.6/10·Rare technical depth attacking a real gap, but you need a signed design partner in 90 days or the GTM risk kills the bet.

One friendly pilot from the cofounder's network after 10 days part-time is not traction, it's a favor with a credit card attached.

7.4/10·Exceptional team with proven exits tackling a real problem, but need to prove this scales beyond Nina's Rolodex.

See where your API/Infrastructure app stacks up

Get a YC-partner-style scorecard on your application in 72 hours. Free.

Get your free roast →