← All verticals
Digital Health

What we learned from Digital Health YC applications

Aggregate insights from real applications roasted on YC Roaster — the patterns YC partners look for, and the weaknesses that come up over and over.

Compare these aggregate benchmarks with your cofounder without sharing your own application.

YC Roaster AI scores, not YC admissions odds.

Apps analyzed

18

Average score

3.38 /5

Updated

Oct 9, 2026

Score breakdown — Digital Health average

App Completeness4.20/5
Early Traction2.78/5
Team Quality3.56/5
Market3.81/5
GTM2.88/5
Scalability3.39/5
Monetization3.06/5

Biggest weaknesses

Where Digital Health applications consistently fall short.

  • 1. Early Traction2.78/5
  • 2. GTM2.88/5
  • 3. Monetization3.06/5

Strongest dimensions

Where Digital Health applications tend to do well.

  • 1. App Completeness4.20/5
  • 2. Market3.81/5
  • 3. Team Quality3.56/5

Score distribution

0-1
0
1-2
1
2-3
3
3-4
11
4-5
3

What our AI judge actually said

Anonymized critique from real Digital Health applications (shared with founder consent).

“Low-cost sensors must predict ACL tears weeks ahead when elite sports science teams with far more resources have not cracked this.”

7.5/10·Strong builders with live pilots, but must prove injury forecasts are accurate enough to change coach behavior and justify recurring spend.

“Your anchor design partner with daily users still won't pay you, that's a fatal signal if it doesn't convert.”

7.2/10·Real wedge with professional club usage, but prove retention and paid conversion before this becomes a feature not a company.

“You have interest signals and conversations, not traction. Students saying they want it is not the same as students using it daily for months.”

5.8/10·Impressive young builder with real execution speed, but this is a promising student project, not yet a proven venture-scale business.

“52 users after a year of audience building across four platforms is catastrophically slow, no viral mechanics, no repeatable acquisition motion.”

6.6/10·Exceptional founder-market fit and research rigor, but the traction is too weak and solo founder velocity is the breaking point.

“Fourth pivot in 18 months, 48 hours old with 100 messages across 10 chats is not traction, it's just turning the product on.”

6.2/10·You ship fast and talk to users, but 5 months of runway means you need paying customers, not pivots.

“Planning a 20x price jump from $30 to $700 monthly based on unproven ROI is founder optimism masquerading as a business model.”

8.4/10·Exceptional execution velocity meets healthcare reality, prove the pricing transition works and this becomes inevitable.

See where your Digital Health app stacks up

Get a YC-partner-style scorecard on your application in 72 hours. Free.

Get your free roast →