← All verticalsLogistics/Supply Chain
What we learned from Logistics/Supply Chain YC applications
Aggregate insights from real applications roasted on YC Roaster — the patterns YC partners look for, and the weaknesses that come up over and over.
Apps analyzed
5
Average score
4.01 /5
Updated
Jun 15, 2026
Score breakdown — Logistics/Supply Chain average
App Completeness4.56/5
Early Traction3.98/5
Team Quality4.10/5
Market3.92/5
GTM3.86/5
Scalability3.86/5
Monetization3.76/5
Biggest weaknesses
Where Logistics/Supply Chain applications consistently fall short.
- 1. Monetization3.76/5
- 2. GTM3.86/5
- 3. Scalability3.86/5
Strongest dimensions
Where Logistics/Supply Chain applications tend to do well.
- 1. App Completeness4.56/5
- 2. Team Quality4.10/5
- 3. Early Traction3.98/5
Score distribution
0-1
0
1-2
0
2-3
0
3-4
2
4-5
3
What our AI judge actually said
Anonymized critique from real Logistics/Supply Chain applications (shared with founder consent).
“One founder using Claude Code shipped fast, but scaling engineering across 50 TMS integrations without a real CTO will hit a wall.”
8.1/10·Strong operator with real traction, Evans at $300K ARR proves pull, but find that technical co-founder in 60 days or stall.
See where your Logistics/Supply Chain app stacks up
Get a YC-partner-style scorecard on your application in 72 hours. Free.
Get your free roast →